A massive debate has erupted online following a bold claim by the popular entertainer and media personality Dr Ofweneke.
Known for his presence in the Kenyan comedy and corporate MC scene, Ofweneke recently suggested that unanswered prayers are the result of a lack of personal sacrifice.
In a post that has quickly gone viral, Ofweneke stated: “You are struggling with your prayers because there is nothing you have sacrificed to God to activate your request.”
The comment has split his audience, with many accusing him of promoting a “transactional” version of faith.
A ‘Transactional’ Relationship?
The response from fans was swift and largely critical. Many users took issue with the idea that God requires a payment or “activation fee” to answer a prayer.
One of the most popular reactions came from @mutenyoras, whose comment gained 43 likes: “We are not in a transactional relationship with God!”
Another user, mrmurigu, expanded on this sentiment. They argued that God loved humanity before they even knew Him, meaning His love cannot be “activated” by human actions. “Brother, all love, but let us not make our relationship with God seem transactional.” — @mrmurigu.
While they acknowledged that obedience is important, they insisted it should stem from love for God rather than a desire to influence His Hand.
Theological Pushback
The debate also took a deep theological turn. Several users pointed to the core tenets of Christianity to refute the entertainer’s claim. @Joe_da_dj suggested that the narrative of sacrifice changed permanently with the crucifixion.
They argued that Jesus was the final sacrifice, replacing the old system of animal sacrifices used to obtain God’s favour.
“Now we have a direct link to God through Him,” @joe_da_dj wrote, adding that this “transactional” message is often used by modern pastors to collect offerings.
@Spiceicecatchy echoed this point, questioning why believers would need to “pay” if the “Full Price” was already paid on the cross. They suggested that the real issue might not be a lack of sacrifice, but rather that people are “not keen enough to listen” to the answers God provides.
“Jesus paid the Price on the Cross, Full Price, why pay??” — @spiceicecatchy.
Differing Perspectives on Sacrifice
Not everyone was entirely dismissive, however. Some followers looked for a middle ground or a different interpretation of what “sacrifice” might mean. @Gi_ericoh noted that sacrifice could take many forms, including giving up “time for God.”
Meanwhile, @ramseyrono simply agreed with the original post, stating, “Its true,” accompanied by a mix of pensive and laughing emojis.
However, the post also drew more cynical reactions. @Wamutua.g.2025 sarcastically remarked that they would rather offer their sacrifices to their ancestors, claiming “they are grateful at least.”
Other users were blunter, with @mumpedro simply labelling Ofweneke’s statement as “Lies.”
