LSK cautions Uhuru on anti-Supreme Court remarks

The Law Society of Kenya has censured President Uhuru Kenyatta against attacks on the Supreme Court judges after his win was nullified.
LSK President Isaac Okero in a statement on Saturday faulted President Kenyatta for describing Chief Justice David Maraga and other judges of the court as ‘wakora‘ (crooks or scoundrels).
President Kenyatta made the remarks during a meet the people tour at Burma market, Nairobi, on Friday moments after the Bench, headed by Mr Maraga, cancelled his victory.
Other Jubilee leaders including Garissa Township MP Aden Duale and Elgeyo Marakwet Senator Kipchumba Murkomen also accused the judges of delivering the wrong judgment.
INDEPENDENCE
Mr Okero said: “Ominously declaring that they (judges) should wait for him (President Kenyatta) after he is successful in the coming fresh election is unfortunate and wholly inappropriate remark from the Head of State who under the constitution is a symbol of national unity, enjoys immunity from criminal and civil proceedings and must promote and enhance the unity of the nation.”
He said Mr Kenyatta ought to safeguard the rights of judges and the Judiciary’s autonomy.
CONSTITUTION
Mr Okero also said that the President has a right to express his opinion, but he should do so appropriately.
“This obligation extends to respecting, upholding and safeguarding the rights of the Chief Justice and each of the judges of the Supreme Court of Kenya under Article 28 to have their inherent dignity respected and protected and to the fundamental freedom under Article 25 from degrading treatment.
“Those remarks violate this obligation and are condemned unreservedly by the Law Society of Kenya,” he added.
PETITION
The LSK boss said the court performed its constitutional duty and warned other leaders against threatening judges.
The Supreme Court, which is head by Mr Maraga, revoked President Kenyatta’s re-election due to irregularities committed by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission.

More From Author

COUNTIES Coast Eastern Mount Kenya Northern North Rift South Rift Nyanza-Kisii Western Latest Counties Sigoti Girls shut down after dorm fires Two in police custody over theft claims Jubilee supporters calm after court judgement Police deployed ahead of Supreme Court decision SPORTS Football Athletics Rugby Golf Others TalkUp Latest Sports Liverpool demanded Sh 24 billion for Coutinho Sharapova advances into US Open last 16 Mexico book World Cup berth Delight as Serena Williams ‘welcomes baby girl’ BLOGS & OPINION Blogs Commentaries Editorial Cartoons Latest Blogs & Opinion CITY GIRL: Mwirigi, I salute you for showing Kenyan youth that no IKUNDA: Challenges, opportunities await governors NGWIRI: We must seek ways to manage negative anger among Kenyans NDUNGU: Poll conducted in line with the law LIFE AND STYLE Art & Culture Family Health Showbiz Travel Women & Style Magazines Latest Life and Style MY STORY: The power of a dream CELEB CONFESSIONS: I was not kicked out of the US-DJ Alemba Literary works have the power to bridge rifts by nurturing empathy Why the influence of Germans at the coast has endured VIDEOS Search  home news How Millie Odhiambo reacted to Supreme Court judgment FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 1 2017 email print Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo lying on the Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo lying on the ground after the Supreme Court nullified President Uhuru Kenyatta’s win on September 1, 2017. PHOTO | JEFF ANGOTE | NATION MEDIA GROUP In Summary Only a summary of the judgment was read. Mr Odinga stayed with the crowd, which led him to City Hall Way. ADVERTISEMENT By JOHN NGIRACHU More by this Author As National Super Alliance (Nasa) MPs crowded about in front of the cameras after the decision of the Supreme Court, Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo was on another level. She cast off her lawyer’s robe and flung herself on the ground behind the statue of the little naked boy with the fish. As she rose, she said, with tears in her eyes: “I had promised the Lord that I would lie prostrate on the ground in front of the Supreme Court.” As she celebrated the ruling in her unique way, other lawmakers were singing and dancing outside the Supreme Court. CROWD Nasa had earlier demanded a reading of the judgment and their expectation, going by what had been said in the court earlier and the setting of the announcement at 11 am, was that it would be a long wait. Only a summary of the judgment was read.

Sigoti Girls shut down after dorm fires

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *