Advertise

Advertise

Twitter to permanently ban conspiracy theorist Alex Jones

CLEVELAND, OH - JULY 21: Alex Stone, of Infowars, Roger Stone, former Donald Trump advisor, and Jonathan Alter pose for a photo following an episode of Alter Family Politics on SiriusXM at Quicken Loans Arena on July 20, 2016 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Ben Jackson/Getty Images for SiriusXM)

Twitter is to permanently ban notorious conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and his Infowars show due to abusive behaviour.
The presenter, who has become infamous for his claims the Sandy Hook massacre did not happen, will not be able to create new accounts on the social media platform or take over existing ones.
Twitter said Jones posted a video on Wednesday in contravention of the company's policy against "abusive behaviour".


preview image0:30
Video:Senator Marco Rubio clashes with Alex Jones
It was referring to a clip of Jones shouting at and berating CNN journalist Oliver Darcy for 10 minutes during congressional hearings about social media.
The 44-year-old so-called shock jock turned up at the hearings, which were attended by numerous US media, and railed against the government, media and social media companies for more than 40 minutes in the hallway as proceedings began.
He then went on to sit in the front row of the Senate hearing, which quizzed various executives from social media giants, and repeatedly interrupted Senator Marcus Rubio during questioning, before further berating him afterwards.

Picture showing a computer screen displaying the Twitter account of Far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones taken on August 15, 2018 in Washngton DC. - Far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones said his Twitter account had been suspended for a week, the latest online platform to take action against the activist. Twitter suspended the personal account of Jones, who operates the Infowars website that has disputed the veracity of the September 11 attacks, the Sandy Hook school massacre and other ev
Image:Jones will not be able to create new Twitter accounts or take over existing ones
Jones had about 900,000 followers on Twitter and Infowars had about 430,000 before the ban.
Twitter had previously suspended Jones for a week over his behaviour.
Other tech companies have also put a temporary block on Jones's accounts, including Facebook.
But Twitter had resisted an outright ban, saying it it only prohibits behaviour that specifically harasses, threatens or uses fear to silence other users.


We welcome everyone to express themselves on our service. Sometimes these expressions may be offensive, controversial, and/or bigoted. We prohibit targeted behavior that harasses, threatens, or uses fear to silence others and take action when they violate our policies.
If individuals are not targeted (e.g. @ mention, tagged in a photo, etc.), we allow a wide range of content as long as it doesn't cross the line into threatening violence.

13:11
Video:April 2018: Reporting on the Sandy Hook massacre
Jones describes himself as a libertarian and a conservative but his opponents have branded him far-right and America's leading inventor of conspiracy theories.
He is currently being sued for defamation by the families of the victims of Sandy Hook, where 20 children were killed in a mass shooting.
After the tragedy, he claimed it was a hoax that had been staged by the government using actors in a bid to increase gun control.
The victims' parents involved in the case claim they have been defamed because Jones implied they were actors, and some of his followers went on to issue death threats against them.

9/11 terror attacks
Image:Jones has claimed the 9/11 terror attacks were a government conspiracy
Jones was also initially on friendly terms with Donald Trump, after interviewing him on one of his shows during the then Republican candidate's presidential campaign.
    He has also claimed the 9/11 attacks were planned by the government, has said other mass shootings were staged and has been blamed for starting the Pizzagate fake news conspiracy.
    During a hearing in which he tried to keep custody of his children, following a split from his wife, his lawyer claimed he did not believe what he said in public and it was all merely an act.

    No comments

    Translate